A section of the dowry laws in the India Penal Codes: "IPC Section 498AWhoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.
In practice, cruelty is taken to include the demanding of a dowry. This section is non-bailable, non-compoundable (i.e. it cannot be privately resolved between the parties concerned) and cognizable (i.e. the police can arrest the accused without investigation or warrants) on a report from a woman or close relative.
ANS#2:
A SECTION WHICH IS BEING MOSTLY MIS-USED
acco to me no, if you both love each other then no issue. there is no anythng above love. people, society will not give you happiness. so be happy and live your life. god will help all.
The word "jatin" is not in the English language dictionary nor the encylopedia.
If what was meant was the word "jatan", that is an acronym for:
Japan Tropical Forest Action Network.
As mentioned in the question itself , post modernisation has no answer .
what you thinks might be answer will be contradict by another statement.
Lack of proper police training and rampant corruption lead to laws not being respected or enforced in India. Without effective enforcement, laws are largely ignored and the problems that resulted in the laws being passed continue on.
its 65 percent of men n 35 of women.
Its 75.26 - men and 53.67 - women
i think an LLB graduate has to give an entrance exam for it..this is all i know
ANS#2:
Enroll yourself with the Bar Counsil of India and after getting an enrollment cerdtificate start practising
As far as I know there are two sections in IPC for fraud i.e 420 and 419 under which a imprisonment could last upto 7 years. This is for a normal fraud, if you talk about cyber fraud then most of the accused are awarded following sections:
420
467
468
471
IT act 65 and 66
I know only this
Namasudra or Nama or Namo ( recently acclaimed as Namaswej or Namassej) is the name of a community who were named as Chandala or Candala which the hatred campaigners liked to pronounce as Charala in rural Banga.
After the British took hold of this Indian continent as their Colony or Empire this community got their name changed as Namasudra. Apparently this is not bad as the Bengali Brahmins at that time told that except themselves all are Sudra(s). And since this community was out-caste so it is a great uplift in their name.
But now it seems obvious that these people might have been ostracized during Sen dynasty for their defying nature.It is a fact ,the namasudras demand , that they understood that the implications are no less worse than the connotations of the word Candala. They proposed their identity from mythological origin theory as Namaswej Or Namassej Or Namassut ( following their founder gotra Or clan from Kasyapa).
At that Time when The Whole Indian Continent is under British control and the elites have been converted to the Serving People of the Rulers or Monarchy which is nothing but Sudra(s) ( public servant) or neo-sudras in India , It looks very astonishing that the Bengalis who never misses the opportunity to demand themselves as progressive
Why at that time Did insisted a Community to be named as "Sudra" when every-one was avoiding that.And not even that only , thence-from Naming people of New professions as new Castes also stopped. It shows the Hypocrisy of the Self Acclaimed Progressive Bengalis who Actually In their Heart were Die-Hard Conservative Hindus at that Time.
Actually Caste system Destroys The mythological Or Divine identity of Human beings.
Since these people were outcast populations they could have been spared like The Rajbanshis or The Gurjars etc. I personally think yet now it is possible to accept their proposed name as Namaswej or Namassej .In a democratic Country Every person is serving His Fellow Peoples so No One should be Named as " Sudra " which invokes a Hatred .
APPEAL :
Without knowing everything don't try to use a forum for a bashing of a particular linguistic community.The Namasudras are well accepted in Bengali society . Dr. N.R.Ray ,a brahmin by caste supported the story of their Ostrcization. It is doubtful whether an alternative name was proposed. Definitely "Sudr" signifies a degraded status if Candala means Defying Social Prejudices. But Emotional connotation of Candala is more Abusing among the common people. The community has not demanded any Change of Their Name to Namaswej Or Namassej or to anything else. The myth of their Origin from Kasyap clan as they Demand has been published in Famous Bengali Magazine like " Anustup" and many others .Please see Namasudra in wikipedia for further references.
What is Necessary is To Be Capable Of Accepting " Others ".Actually the truth is that they were Socially Known as Namasudras from the Time of The Sen King when they were ostracized .Later In course of time The King Further Haunted them to the swamps of South -Banga and being declared out-caste by The King they Became known as Chandal Or Candala > Charala .And then again During British Regime they were documented as Nmasudra ( back again ) which was most Strongly opposed By Historian N.K.Basu but Dr. N.R.Ray supported It .History , Myths and several other findings supported Dr.N.R.ray's Interpretation of History of Bengali People ( which includes the modern genome research also).
According to the principles of Hindu Law, there is coparcenership between the different members of a united family and survivorship following upon it. But this right of survivorship is lost if the marriage of the coparcener is solemnized under the Special Marriage Act of 1872.
There is community of interest and unity of possession between all the members and upon death of any one of them, the others take by survivorship that in which they had during the deceased's lifetime a common possession. [Katama Nachiar v Raja of Shivaganga (1863) 9 MIA 539, 611; Subramanya Pandian v. Sivasubramania Pillai (1894) 17 Mad 316, 328]
The right of survivorship rests upon the text of Narada and is recognised in the Mitakshara. [Subramanya Pandian v. Sivasubramania Pillai (1894) 17 Mad 316, 330.
The Arthasastra of Kautilya clearly lays down the rule of survivorship. "If a man has no male issue, his own brothers or person who have been living with him shall take possession of his property; and in their absence, his daughters shall have his property".
Narada says: "If among several brothers, one childless should die or become a religious ascetic, the other shall divide his property, excepting the stridhana". In other words, survivorship consists in the exclusion of the widows and other heirs of the coparcener from succeeding to his undivided interest in the coparcenary property. Even a disqualified person is a member of the coparcenary and even though he has no rights at a family partition, he is entitled, when he becomes the last surviving male member of the joint family, to take and enjoy the whole estate by survivorship. [Muthuswami Gurukkal v. Meenammal (1919) 43 Mad. 664.]
The rule of survivorship is precluded when there is attachment of the undivided share of coparcenary for his personal debt and is sold in execution even if the coparcener dies subsequently when the attachment subsists on the date of death. [Bharamappa v. Rudrappa AIR 1955 MYs. 13 : ILR (1954) Mys 361]
No. A person cannot lose their parental rights to a child unless they file a voluntary relinquishment of parental rights petition and it is accepted by the court or the court permanently terminates parental rights due to abuse, neglect or some other applicable issue.
I think, mentally even our law professionals have not accpeted the share of female child, so as not to answer this question.
No, a theory is an idea someone has to explain something. The veracity of a theory needs testing.
A law is an explanation for something, where the veracity of the explanation has been widely tested and as a result of this testing the explanation has not yet been disproved.
If a person conceals the facts of former marriage from the person with whom the subsequent marriage is contracted, then he shall be punishable with imprisonment, which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
MARRIAGE CEREMONY FRAUDULENTLY GONE THROUGH WITHOUT LAWFUL MARRIAGE
There are two essential requirements:
PUNISHMENT
Fraudulent or Mock marriages are made punishable. Any person committing it shall be punishable with imprisonment, which may extend to seven years, and is also liable to fine also.
The background is in the picture, so your question does not make a whole lot of sense.